Re: So You Think You Can Direct, here’s how to video (this one featuring Heidi and Benji who are participants on So You Think You Can Dance winning a big swing dance competition). No camera tricks.
« June 2006 | Main | August 2006 »
Re: So You Think You Can Direct, here’s how to video (this one featuring Heidi and Benji who are participants on So You Think You Can Dance winning a big swing dance competition). No camera tricks.
July 24, 2006 | Permalink | Comments (1)
So You Think You Can Dance is one of those secret TV pleasures that liven up the summer with good looking, earnest young people who actually know they can dance. Pound for pound, there’s a lot more talent on this show than, for instance, American Idol. The problem is, it’s hard to watch. It’s hard because the director, Don Weiner (you can see his unimpressive resume here) isn’t satisfied to let us watch the dancers. He has to do his director thing. What I know about TV directing you can put in a teacup, but I am an expert viewer. And I would like Mr. Weiner to quit changing cameras and angles all the time. Here’s what I mean. In last Thursday’s opening two minute segment, Weiner gave us fifty-four different views of action. I didn’t count panning shots. So about every two seconds he snaps to a different view of the choreography of ten dancers moving frantically about a stage. Throughout the course of the show it’s pretty obvious that Director Weiner doesn’t even go to rehearsal. He goes in for close-ups when they are inappropriate. He loses dancers from his frame. He cuts to different angles during big moves and misses them completely. What we get is a fast moving slide show that breaks the rhythm of the routines and leaves ones eyeballs twisted. I’m going to guess that more fans of this show would enjoy it if there was one camera that shot the action from the audience POV. With dance there is already movement. That’s what it’s about, right? The director doesn’t have to detract from this or justify his existence by constantly changing cameras. I’ve complained about these directors before. They pretty much wreck a lot of shows like Idol and Dancing With The Stars. They are out of control. Imagine a football game where the director changed the camera angle multiple times during the course of a play. Football directors are pretty bad too with lots of changes just before the play begins (close up of the huddle, close up of the quarterback, pan to the linebacker). But when the action starts they let you see it without interference. I read somewhere (probably in Wired Magazine) that someday the viewer at home will be able to select the camera view they want to look at. Something to look forward to.
July 22, 2006 | Permalink | Comments (3)
We are reveling in balmy, humid, overcast weather with a current temperature at 3pm Friday of 82 degrees. This is 25 degrees cooler than the 107 which the weather services had predicted. They are still calling for Ashland to be 101. Not a chance today. We’ll see about tomorrow. We will consider this a happy reprieve for now. Our little group scheduled golf today anyway, disrespecting the forecast. As we teed off, clouds began to roll in from the east and south. Soon there was complete cloud cover and a light breeze. Humid, yes, but the nicest golfing weather in the last month. No blazing sun. The course was fairly empty. Many had apparently decided not to play because of the scorching forecast. And, on the eighteenth hole we were treated to raindrops. We aren’t complaining. Hope they are wrong tomorrow, too.
July 21, 2006 | Permalink | Comments (0)
We are well into the hammock season which for me means crime fiction (and sometimes nonfiction) by the stack. So, here are some quick and dirty summaries of hammock books to get you through the hot weather.
Rain Fall by Barry Eisler—Crime fiction has many sub-genres. This is a hit man thriller set in Tokyo and featuring a half-Japanese American and former Green Beret who kills for hire. But he’s a good killer; our hero and protagonist. His technique can be subtle or brutal. He will break your neck or send a radio signal to your pacemaker to give you an untraceable heart attack. John Rain loves jazz and becomes involved with the daughter of one of his victims. She’s an up and coming jazz pianist and may hold the key to a potentially far-reaching scandal that could overthrow the Japanese Government. Rain gets caught between the CIA, the Tokyo underworld and the Japanese police in a fast moving story that holds your attention. The author obviously knows Japan and, as ambiance is important in crime fiction, creates a bit of a Tokyo travelogue as the indomitable John Rain karate chops and schemes his way to a successful conclusion, inevitably losing the girl in the end.
One Shot by Lee Child—Lee Child has created a super hero named Jack Reacher who is most guy’s idea of what they’d like to be (when they were sixteen years old): 6’5”, 250lbs of muscle and guile, smart as blazes, unbeatable in a fight, brave to the point of recklessness, irresistible to women and unencumbered by possessions. Reacher is a former major in the military police. Did I mentioned he is a fabulous shot? In Child’s books Reacher appears out of nowhere, solves the crime, screws the gals, thumps the villains then disappears with a hearty hi ho Silver. Genre-wise, it’s a procedural as Reacher, always entertaining and surprising with his audacity and in his ability to improvise, finds the perp and beats them, stabs them, shoots them, or all of the above. In One Shot a former Army sniper is accused of indiscriminately killing several citizens. He calls for Jack Reacher. Reacher knows the guy has done it before but soon learns he didn’t do it this time. In the climactic scene Reacher has to single-handedly attack a house that has a 200 yard clear fire zone around it. The house is occupied by several armed men, one of whom is a tremendous shot with a night scoped rifle. The house is protected by an infra red detection system. Reacher is armed with a knife. Does he do it? Oh yeah... Nobody like Jack Reacher.
By A Spider’s Thread by Laura Lippman—I’m going to guess that Ms. Lippman’s detective, Tess Monaghan, maybe looks like a younger, stronger, taller version of herself, a kind of attractive blond with a wide mouth and a serious look. Tess operates her own little detective firm in Baltimore. She’s half Jewish and half Irish which gives the author opportunities to speak for both communities. Tess is kind of lonely. Her boyfriend from an earlier book, a rock musician, has gone off to take care of her cancer stricken mother. Tess is recovering from a wound from a previous book and is a bit traumatized but is short on cash so takes a missing persons job. A beautiful young mother has left her conservative Jewish husband and split with the kids. Why, where and with whom did she go? Tess uses good detective work, with help from her on-line support group of female detectives around the country self-styled as the “snoop sisters”—to run the missing wife to ground. The gal has a past unknown to her husband and the mystery, as it unfolds, is an interesting one. It kept my hammock swinging.
Winter of the Wolf Moon by Steve Hamilton—like all of the above, Wolf Moon is a series. (We crime fiction readers enjoy a good series). Alex McKnight is a broken down ex-cop, ex-minor league baseball player who has sort of retired to a camp on the Upper Peninsula of Michigan where his late father had built a complex of cabins which Alex rents to fishermen and snowmobilers and where he often gets involved in solving a mystery. It’s colder than hell in the UP and it snows all the time. Alex has a snow plow on the front of his pickup truck and has to plow his way into his cabin every night on his way home from the local bar where he has a lonely dinner each evening while drinking Canadian beer that the barkeep especially stocks for him. His neighbor, an Indian, recruits Alex into a league hockey game. The action starts there when he gets into it with the hot dog star of the opposing team. Later, this fellow’s girlfriend asks Alex for help; then she disappears. There’s a bag of drugs, narcotics cops, an unfriendly police chief, a friendly sheriff, snowmobilers, lots of snow, a couple of beatings, a trip to Canada, a night in jail, and a solution to the mystery. Good cold book for a hot summer day.
Dancing With the Virgins by Stephen Booth—an English mystery of the psychological thriller sub-genre set in the north country in the moors of the Peak Park. There seems to be a serial killer. The lead protagonists of the book, Ben Cooper and Diane Fry, intensely dislike each other for some reason and that’s a bigger mystery than who killed the mountain biker who was really an animal activist who was trying to stop the dogfights held in the farm near the park and was somehow involved with the lady lawyer who got her face slashed and can’t remember anything and her dead daughter who the lawyer had adopted out years ago. Booth’s style is to tell the story in a series of short scenes that sometimes seem arbitrary. He’s probably a better writer than many of his colleagues but perhaps is too ambitiously trying to be a novelist. All we crime readers want is plot, ambiance, action, good characters and resolution.
Soul Circus by George Pelecanos—Pelecanos is a producer of HBO’s Wired and his novels which take place on the mean streets of DC are gritty and real. In Soul Circus the detective is a fifty something black guy named Derek Strange who has a younger, white partner named Terry Quinn. Strange is working on the defense team of a drug dealer. Quinn is looking for a missing girl. The plot is good but with Pelecanos what you get is a scary tour of the underbelly of our nation’s capital with its down and outers, lowlifes, criminals and street people. Pelecanos always delivers. He’s one of the best.
A Death in Belmont by Sebastian Junger—Junger is well known as the author of The Perfect Storm. In this strange little memoir/reportage he tells the true story of the Boston Strangler who terrorized the greater Boston area in the early sixties and became a legendary serial murderer of women. Junger’s family had a person experience with Albert DeSalvo who was convicted of being the Boston Strangler. DeSalvo worked as a carpenter on a remodeling project at the Junger home in Belmont, Massachusetts when Sebastian was an infant. The front piece of the book has a photo of Mrs. Junger holding her baby. Behind her are the contractor who built her studio and a young, handsome Albert DeSalvo. She had an uncomfortable encounter with DeSalvo during the course of his employment but generally had a good impression of him. During the job a women was murdered a short distance from the Junger home. A black house cleaner, a refugee from the South, was arrested and convicted. But Junger tries to make the case that the black fellow was innocent, a victim of racism. That DeSalvo may have been the perpetrator. And, Junger raises questions, too, as to whether or not DeSalvo was, in fact, the Boston Strangler which was impossible to prove conclusively in the days before DNA. Last year we spent a couple months in Belmont so it was interesting to read a story which had a familiar scene as a backdrop. The murder in question had taken place just a few blocks away from the house our kids were renting. Who knew?
Okay, that stack is finished. Back to the library.
July 19, 2006 | Permalink | Comments (1)
I used to watch every sport that played across the TV screen. Baseball, football, hockey, lacrosse, even roller derby. I was a sports fanatic, eager to see the action, obsessed with the result, identifying with the participants. As the years passed I lost interest, eschewed the Final Four, Wimbleton, The Superbowl, the World Series, the Rose Bowl and the Stanley Cup. They seemed unimportant, corrupted somehow by scandal, drugs, big money and narcissism. The only sport that seemed relevant was golf which was totally individual, self-policed and void of trash talk. Yet viewing a golf tournament is often akin to watching grass grow so lately I only tune in to LPGA golf which has the added of attraction of Paula Creamer’s pink ball, Michelle Wie’s super long legs, Annika’s nifty calve muscles and Natalie Gulbis’s superb overbite. I digress. Please excuse. The point here is that I have discovered the ultimate in sport. (No. It’s not cage fighting). It is the relatively unknown sport of “Staredown,” practiced by a growing cadre of dedicated professionals. They are professionals in name only for there is, as yet, no money to be made as a member of NASP, the National Association of Staredown Professionals. The sages are fond of saying that “The eyes are the windows to the soul.” Staredown is the competitive manifestation of this ancient wisdom. The official historian of Staredown has source evidence that the sport originated in ancient Egypt. It is very difficult to explain Staredown to the uninitiated. Helpfully, a young film director, J. R. McCord, has created an hour long documentary (Unflinching Triumph) that details the origins, history and evolution of professional staredown. The film features an up and coming Staredown professional named Philip Rockhammer and follows his progress as he tries to rest the title from five time winner, the Michael Jordan of Staredown—Tony Patterson. The documentary is sympathetic to Philip’s trials because, frankly, Tony Patterson is somewhat of a jackass. Indisputably, however, his patented move, jamming the jackhammer, messes up opponents and allows Tony to win victory after victory. Philip has a couple of moves as well, specifically—wrestling the woodpecker and sailing to Ecuador on a boat made of shoestrings. (The moves are impossible to describe). The Staredown community is small and tight. They are focused on success and victory. The rewards are esoteric to be sure and, in Philip’s case, were it not for his girlfriend Chrissy who supports him, pays his bills and drives him around, he would not be able to compete. Director J. R. McCord follows Philip and his entourage as Philip attempts to discover his inner Puma and defeat Tony for the national championship. Pure sport is hard to fathom. Staredown is as pure as it gets. In Staredown the normal sports metaphors, clichés and trite sayings gain freshness. Staredown opens up the possibility of new athletic fantasies. One yearns to grab the Visine and give it a try. The documentary is highly recommended, nearly as profound, in its own way, as Supersize Me or An Inconvenient Truth.
To wet your appetite you can see the trailer here.
July 17, 2006 | Permalink | Comments (2)
The recent death of a neighbor reminds me how close we all come to serious, even critical mishaps. An excruciating accumulation of decisions and actions, our own and others, determine if we live or die another day. Sometimes we are aware of the close call. Sometimes not.
This ten second video illustrates the point.
July 13, 2006 | Permalink | Comments (1)
Great customer service should be mentioned in dispatches. Some years ago we installed some new windows in our house. Recently two of them broke. Son Shawn took them apart and we discovered the mechanism that raises, lowers and holds them up was broken. Shawn tried to rebuild the broken part but couldn’t so I began a search for the window manufacture and the part. Labels were worn off but found a stamp on one that said Empire Pacific Windows http://www.empirepacificwindows.com/ and a part number. The following correspondence ensued. New parts received today by FEDX.
To: service@empirepacificwindows.com
Subject: need a part
Part 2040 (and an upside down and backwards F) I don't know the name
but it's the mechanism that raises and lowers the window. One on each
side of the window.
I need one of these to repair a window that was installed around
1990. The rivet holding the spring pulled loose.
Are they available? Can I order from you or do I need to go through a
dealer? Cost?
Thanks for your help.
RSmith
Sir,
Just got this and am responding to it the best I can. 2040 to me
means a balancer... There should be a small stamp that is located on the
balancer. This would be for a SH window, one that slides vertically. Our
warranty here is for the original homeowner only and it started post 1990.
What I will do for you however is mail you the balancers if you wish. If
they are incorrect there will not be much more I can do for you. Please get
back to me with the following.
The window size - Actual frame size. Should be in ft or half ft. like
3'0"x4'0" written as 3040 or 36x46 I.E. Then verify that stamp to ensure
it's a 2040 balancer. Let me know and I can send you a few.
Thanks,
Adam Vanderpool
Empire Pacific Windows
Service Dept
Adam,
Thanks for your quick reply. Here are some photos of the part which
is 22" long.
The windows are 36' X 46" and single hung. I've got two windows and
the balancer (if that's what you call it) is breaking down in each
one. The string on the pulley arrangement breaks. Trying to repair it
I damaged them more.
I'm not looking for warrantee coverage on these although I did buy
the windows and had them installed by a contractor who is no longer
in business. I'd be happy to pay for four of these.
Again, appreciate your help.
RSmith
Sir,
It does appear that they are indeed 2040 balancers. They're spring
loaded as you've seen and that is what makes them somewhat difficult to
replace. I can send you 4 of these at no charge. They issue lies in having
them installed. If you can do it yourself great! If not; then you would need
to find another source. I'll get them out to you in the mail today at the
address shown below.
Thanks,
Adam Vanderpool
Empire Pacific Windows
Service Dept
July 10, 2006 | Permalink | Comments (3)
Queries are pouring in asking how the Panty Test is going. Barely There did send two pairs of panties as promised. Shockingly, although the label proclaimed they were Linda’s size, the panties appeared to be designed for a twelve year old girl. And, they were cut in an unfamiliar bikini style. Linda gallantly pulled the tiny garment on and tried to wear the thing over the course three days. Unfortunately, there was too much Linda or not enough panty. Normally, she’s no quitter but these Barely There’s lived up to their brand name. She reluctantly dropped out of the test and forwarded these reports from the field to Barely There headquarters:
Hi Rachel,
My panties for the "Barely There" online survey arrived yesterday.
Surprise at the smallness of the package. Much tinier than I usually wear. Nice nude color. Smell okay. I wonder if I can get them on and will they be comfortable? They are my size. Very stretchy. I sit down. Will they roll over and down in front? Hike up too much in the rear. Do I want to do this? Should I send them back? Are they counting on me? I look in the mirror. Maybe I should do some stomach crunches. Maybe these particular panties are designed for twelve year olds and very skinny ladies. Have I already failed the pantie test? Hummm..
I'll try them for a couple of days. I'm either going to grow to love them or hate them.
Day two:
It's fun to be selected, receive something free and feel special.
(An interesting development..right now, as I'm sitting here, I can feel the front panel starting to actually roll over and down.)
I'm hanging in there for the washing but I hope it's okay if I decide not to continue.....
Day three: I'm sorry to report that the panty testing ended today.
When it came time to get dressed for our three mile hike, I just couldn't bring myself to pull on an uncomfortable pair of underwear.
I guess it just reaffirmed in my own mind that I already have years of panty testing (under my belt) and feel comfortable, secure, happy and satisfied with my dramatic, zippy, clingy, purrrfect fit (not chosen by my grandmother) "Barely There" panty choice of five years.
Thanks for the fun opportunity. I hope this is okay. I am and continue to be a spokesperson and fan. Love this line of undergarments!
Best Wishes and Cheers,
ps..my husband will probably get another blog out of this...
I just thought of an interesting marketing promotional idea for the larger boomer demographic.
In my lifetime, I've gone from, "Girdles and garter belts to Barely There."
July 07, 2006 | Permalink | Comments (0)
National Anthem sung in 1993 by the Grateful Dead.
July 04, 2006 | Permalink | Comments (1)